Schools, photo IDs and privacy

Every year when children return to school, parents wade through and sign a stack of forms.  Buried in the middle is a form where you check off one box giving permission to have your son or daughter’s picture taken for a student ID and another for the school to take or use their photo if the media should need it.  What if you discovered the school offered that photo to the police for a photo line up?

This is exactly what happened to one student at a Boston high school.  Here are the facts.  The student left the school and got on a public bus to return home.  Later in the day, police allege that he robbed another student of his cell phone and ipod.  The detective on the case went to the police officer at the school to see if he could obtain a student photo.  This police officer, in turn, went to school staff who handed him the student ID, which had a photo, name and date of birth.  The police did not have a search warrant and no one had asked for or received parental consent. 

However, the background of the ID was quite different from other photos the detective had.  So the police officer assigned to the school went back to school staff and asked for and received several more student photo IDs.  These other students probably bore some resemblance to the suspected student (no doubt they were all male) and all their pictures had been taken in front of the same background.  Again, there was no search warrant or parental notification or consent. The photos were enlarged and the names and birth dates were removed.

The victim made an identification, charges were filed and the case went to court.  The judge in juvenile court barred the police and district attorney’s office from using the photo array as evidence saying the student had a “reasonable expectation of privacy.”  An appeal was filed and it was heard before the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court.  Last week, the court sent the case back to the juvenile court saying there wasn’t enough evidence presented in the case on how student ID cards are created and used in order for them to made a decision.  “In ruling as he did, the judge made certain assumptions about the photograph that may well be correct, but evidence supporting the assumptions is not in the record before us,” Justice Margot Botsford wrote for a unanimous court.

After many well-publicised school shootings, beginning with Columbine in 1999, towns and cities across the U.S. began locating police officers in schools.  Administrators, staff, parents and the community were worried about safety.  Today, many schools have police or school resource officers located on school grounds.  Unsurprisingly, when school resource officers are co-located they are often treated as fellow school staff. The boundaries can blur.

A parent’s job is to keep their child from harm. We do this because we love our children and know that while we can’t keep every hurt at bay, we can try to shield them from a great deal.  When we sign those permission forms for a photo to be taken or used for media purposes, none of us imagine we are agreeing to let the police use those photos.  Besides the student who the police suspected, there were 6 or 7 other students whose photo IDs were pulled by the resource officer and handed over to the detective.  These students were guilty of nothing more than bearing a resemblance to the student suspected of robbery or having their picture taken in front of the same background. What if any of them had been mistakenly identified? For a parent to willingly agree to have their child’s photo in a police line up qualifies as putting their child in harm’s way.

Schools often take on the task of teaching students to be wary of sharing personal information on the internet, facebook or by texting.  Parents often worry about their child’s personal information being used for some nefarious purpose but also know that a photo ID can benefit their child as well.  We all recognize the need for the school to have information about our children.  What should be our expectation of privacy?

Tags: , , , , , ,

5 Responses to Schools, photo IDs and privacy

  1. Marie Niarhos says:

    This is a serious matter. Thanks for bringing it to the attention of parents.

    I was surprised to learn that here in MD parents have to opt out in order for a child’s information to remain private to the selective service. Our kids can be approached and given a sales pitch by military recruiters in school. When we moved here and registered our kids in HS, no one mentioned this to us. Only later did I learn that I had to request the form, fill it out and submit it in order for my kids to be left alone. Something else to think about.

    • Marion Freedman-Gurspan says:

      Unless the law has changed, it is the same in MA. You have to opt out not to have recruiters talk to your child. If the student is 18, presumably the student has to sign the opt-out form.

  2. Marie Niarhos says:

    My husband just
    informed me that selective service was the wrong agency. It had to do with military recruitment. I am not really up on this, but was very upset when I heard my kids were being targeted by recruiters.

  3. Bobby Roderiques says:

    I feel that the schools violate our students rights all the time. School picture IDs should be private. Regarding the police in the schools. I have been informed that police officers can be present when any school personel question a student about an incident, and that what the student says can be used against him by the police. I feel that this is a huge violation of the student’s rights.

  4. Pingback: Schools, Photo IDs, and Privacy | Juvenile Justice Blog